The article I have looked at offers two
corresponding views of America and the British settlement in Carolina: one from
an official in 1699, the other from a father in 1712. Both share their
experiences of what they have seen in this new settlement and what they believe
to be the future of Carolina.
The official Edward Randolph is reporting
back to the English Board of Trade and Plantations, and recognizes the strength
that the colony has in its plantations and the prosperous future this will
hold. Through the work of around
5000 slaves, he speaks of the growth of precious commodities such as cotton,
wool and indigo, whilst also focusing on more basic possessions like rice,
pitch and tar. Much to the probable delight of the readers, this will be for
the benefit of the “revenue of the crown.” He even suggests that to keep this
profit high back in England, that the government suspends the introduction of
taxes to keep the planters from growing cheap products whilst margin is high
for growing more expensive items. This is an unsurprising revelation that most
of the early decisions made by the government back in England were influenced
by officials in the colonies that were clearly unaffected by the harsh
conditions that slaves worked in and were solely focused on the economic boom
there work would stimulate in England. There is noticeable paranoia in
Randolph’s letter however, as he senses incoming threat from the south as the
French settle in Mississippi and have the opportunity to threaten the English
settlements without much opposition. Incidents like these may have influenced
the decision to send more of the English over to extend their settlement in
future ways.
The second article with James Freeman, a
Carolina planter, is even more unsympathetic to the slaves that work for him. His
view is that the slaves are at his command for the payment of basic clothes,
other necessities and a small wage. When asked if the English are slaves when
they arrive in the country themselves, Freeman answers that there is no such
thing as “Christian slaves” or that slavery is something that involves people
from the “Queen’s Dominions.” To me this sounds like more of the same from this
belief that the English are superior to their slaves, just as they had believed
themselves superior to the Native people.
No comments:
Post a Comment